manual with the united states government or the united states military, rather. one being the crsc and the other one being the crdp. that is two separate programs for service-related injuries relating to combat or non-combat. >> this was a military base, so these families cannot receive the same death benefits or benefits in general that those in other attacks would be served. interestingly, the critics have said look, this is part of a larger narrative of the obama administration, not wanting to label things terrorism. we just saw what unfolded in libya. we know about the underwear bomber that they called a lone wolf, just a deranged individual. what do you say to that? does this play into some sort of larger narrative from the government not wanting to classify these things as terrorism? >> i think that's very possible. it's hard to fathom o the fact that these are considered lone wolfs or the act of workplace violence when it clearly states in the fbi investigation and the webster report and the joint task terrorism force that they failed to encounter terroris